| Shared Movies Over 80 Million Movies and TV-Shows No Charge per movie, No download limit! | Casino Classic Best Online Casino! Get $500 free on the house! | Weight Loss Supplements Natural supplements that burn body fat, suppress appetite and support a healthy diet. | Antidepressant Medications Handle stress, elevate the mood, treat anxiety disorders. |
|
Posted at December 31, 1969, 6:00 pm: nice portrait mitch hmmm... It's not bad per se that you used a photograph for reference--but the lighting that the flash of the camera put on her face is not ideal, therefore your drawing suffers a little from having a reference that isn't great. You'll warm up to this reference choice matter eventually, I don't think i really understood it until a year or two ago. The cameras in wide production these days have the flash parallel and very near where the image capturing part is. It's great for a flash fill, but in a lower or indoor light kind of situation, you get this mug-shot-ish "FlashBulb right in the Face" effect that's not flattering to the person. Informational, yes, as in, you can totally recognize the person, and even get a great likenesss if you use this as your reference for the basic forms of the face and not for the shading. In this case i think you've done a really good job working up the soft tones of her face, (not easily done; getting that very soft, buttery flesh look with graphite) though the hair needs some variation in tone. hope that you will post more soon ... if you talk to that fat kid tell him to lose some weight joel Original of the message was taken from http://www.conceptart.org/forums/ Previous Post: Gugguenmanueverd- thanks man, i think i'm gonna attack it one more tim... Next Post: Hey mitch, strong portrait, guggenmaneuver took the crit right out of ... |